I’m in the Market for a New Job

After over a year working on my own projects, I find I really miss leading and working with a team of good people. Working alone has its advantages but isn’t as fulfilling for me.

Therefore I’m once again throwing my hat into the ring. I’m looking for a full time job and would love to hear about great opportunities and teams which could use my help.

For those who don’t know, here’s little guidance about what I do:

  • I used to program but no longer do so and would prefer to keep it that way. While I can program I do not enjoy it much. I have always found it much easier/more pleasant to read code than to write it.
  • My strengths lie in the realm of management of technical people and projects. I thrive on building and helping incredible teams of geeks to accomplish amazing things.
  • I understand business, marketing, and technology and enjoy exploring the intersections between them.

What I am looking for:

  • I would enjoy performing any of the following roles (most of which I have done previously in my career):
    • VP/Director/Manager of a software engineering team or department
    • Technical Project Manager
    • Community Manager
    • Developer Evangelist
  • While I currently live in San Francisco, after five years of saying, “Imma gonna move to Portland!” I’ve finally decided to follow through on the statement. Therefore it’s required that the job either is based in Portland, Oregon or will allow me to work remotely.
  • I would be beside myself with professional glee if I am able to find a position with a company or organization which is friendly to open source/data/access/etc.

For more information, have a look at my resume.

Need to know even more? There’s always my website.

Know of a position or have more questions? Feel free to send me email at `resume` at the $domain.$tld of this webpage.

I look forward to seeing what sort of amazing opportunities are lying in wait. Allons y!

The Rising Costs of Aging Perlers: Part 3, The Suggestions

So, what can the Perl community do to avert this decline and potential extinction? Probably a great many things, but here are my three top suggestions:

  1. Make cool shit. Talk about it. Talk about it A LOT. What little positive image Perl retains in these modern times is primarily limited to making sysadmin/dev ops lives easier. While this is a worthy and admirable accomplishment, it’s not going to turn any heads. People will (and do) not want to learn a language with a stodgy reputation. The best way to shed that reputation is to use the language to develop cutting edge tools and services, then to shout it from the mountain tops. DuckDuckGo is written in Perl and is going toe to toe with Google. Lacuna Expanse has shattered the Perl gaming boundaries. Follow their lead. Show people what you think is possible and they’ll start proving you wrong by creating the seemingly impossible.
  2. Modernize our dilapidated online communities. As the enlightened humans we are, we like to say that looks don’t matter. Unfortunately that’s not the way our brains are wired Looks do matter, or at least they do in this case. Take, for instance, the venerable PerlMonks. The site contains a limitless source of knowledge, both historical and contemporary. But its user interface and experience are both stuck in the late 1990’s and have become punchlines for a programming language which is trying to claim relevance in the current world of technology. This perception, unfortunately, is transferred to the Perl language at large. If we want to attract new community members, we need to do it with a modern sensibility, language, and tools. Online services where you can try out Perl programming in your browser. The latest in forum and moderation technologies. An interface which uses current best practices for usability and design.

    While I was doing research for this article, I came across this quote about linguistic cultural extinction which is quite relevant to Perl’s current situation:

    On a larger, less methodical scale, linguists agree that the single most important step towards ensuring a language does not disappear is the fostering of favorable conditions for its speakers to employ the language and to ensure that it is taught to their children. Approaches to Conservation

    Perl, as it currently stands, is not fostering those favorable conditions. It needs to modernize its presentation and approach to make itself more approachable and appealing to a new generation of programmers.

  3. TPF should fund training, outreach and community building to the same level as language development (if not more). According to The Perl Foundation‘s own mission statement, it is “…dedicated to the advancement of the Perl programming language through open discussion, collaboration, design, and code.” At no point does it mention community or training as a part of its raison d’être and I find that to be a grave oversight in desperate need of correction. A language is only advanced so long as it thrives. A language cannot thrive without practitioners and a strong community to support them. TPF is dropping the ball here, allowing the language they’re sworn to advance to founder in a morass of indifference and insignificance. It does not matter how many grants they hand out for language improvements which no one is going to use. As the effective figurehead of the Perl community, I feel only TPF is in a position to make the sort of changes necessary to drag Perl back into relevance and to allow it to grow and thrive, and these changes are not predominantly technical in nature. TPF should take the reins it recently appears so reticent to accept and both guide and grow the community through outreach and grants based upon measurable milestones. TPF: Accept responsibility for increasing the ranks of Perl programmers and the overall perception of our language within the programming community. Advance our language in ways which matter (read: not solely technological) and do it now before there is nothing left to advance.

So, here’s the thing.

You don’t have to agree with much of what I say above. But agreement isn’t necessary in order to think about the issue. And that’s what I urge you to do: start thinking about this as a legitimate issue. Even this cursory look at the current landscape of Perl usage and the Perl community shows that its aging and dwindling numbers are worthy of concern. I repeat: We are becoming the Shakers of the programming world and if we do nothing to change this then we will end up the same way they did.


Postscript…
During the process of writing this article I did a lot of research into cultural extinction. The concepts there are disturbingly applicable to what the Perl community is facing now. To end, I’d like to share a particularly relevant quote from Francis X. Hezel:

The key to cultural survival, then, is not purely conservatism—hanging on tightly to all that we have received in the past—but a genuine sense of dynamism and a readiness to adapt to a changing world. Strategies for economic development that entail change, therefore, may be seen as ways of promoting survival, material and cultural. Some of what we have understood in the past as either-or dichotomies ought to be re-examined in the light of this new model of culture.

The Rising Costs of Aging Perlers: Part 2, The Business

At this point you’re entirely justified in asking, “So what?”

The fact of the matter is, the lack of junior programmers is a very big deal from a business point of view, both to companies which already use Perl and those who might otherwise consider it. This directly and strongly impacts the bottom line of any Perl-using development shop.

According to Payscale.com, in San Francisco the median pay for a junior software developer is $66,000. For a senior software developer it’s $111,000. To be honest, we’re in a boom here right now. It’s my experience as a software development manager that each of these numbers is at least $20-$30K too low, but let’s run with the Payscale numbers. It’s obvious that a senior software developer is going to cost a shop a minimum of nearly $50,000 more than a junior developer.

Now consider the structure and needs of your typical software development department. There are a number of tasks which absolutely require the skills and expertise only a senior developer can bring to bear, but the majority of the work most likely can be performed by more junior developers with appropriate supervision. You do not need every member of your team to be senior and, at an extra $50K a head, you can’t afford to do it anyway. That sort of staff expenditure is an irresponsible business practice. However, as unreasonable as it is to expect a company to pay so much more for experience they don’t need, it’s equally unreasonable to expect a senior developer to accept less pay than (s)he has earned through years of training and experience.

Companies in this position, in order to continue using Perl, will have few options available to them. One of those options is to start training all incoming developers to use the language. While this is possible (undoubtedly some companies already do this), it is itself a very expensive proposition, often costing tens of thousands of dollars in training costs, time and productivity. A number of companies may run the numbers on the investment they’d be required to make in training and decide that it provides a much lower return than undertaking the arduous task of rearchitecting the software to use a language where they are able to hire staff (and at a more reasonable rate of pay).

Alternatively, companies which do not yet use Perl may be turned away from the language for similar reasons. The harsh financial realities of running a business—rather than technological merit—will end up dictating which programming language a company will use for their product. Selecting a language for which you can only hire senior developers is a very bad business practice, which leaves Perl in a poor position from a business point of view.

From where I’m standing, it does not appear as though the Perl community is doing much to correct this issue. As I detailed in my earlier post, in many cases Perl’s new programmer outreach appears fairly crummy if not virtually non-existent. This needs to change before Perl starts to face a cultural extinction. Perl needs to start creating fledgling Perlers to help sustain and grow the language through it’s next twenty-five years. As well, this will add new blood to the community and help diversify the gene pool. The more diverse a community, the better it’s able to adapt to the changing conditions which might otherwise overwhelm it.

A diverse or deep gene pool gives a population a higher chance of surviving an adverse change in conditions. Effects that cause or reward a loss in genetic diversity can increase the chances of extinction of a species. Population bottlenecks can dramatically reduce genetic diversity by severely limiting the number of reproducing individuals and make inbreeding more frequent. Wikipedia page on Extinction

In the final post of this series, I’ll detail some suggestions for avoiding this cultural extinction. Read Part 3.

The Rising Costs of Aging Perlers: Part 1, The Data

Hello, Friendly Perl Community! You may not want to hear this, but you’re not getting any younger. This is having a dramatic effect on the bottom line of companies which do or would use Perl.

A few months ago I started helping a friend recruit Perl developers for the company where he works. Aside from talking to the many people I know in the community I also put out several open calls for developers interested in switching jobs. I’ve now met and spoken with many great people—most of whom I’d never have had the chance to meet otherwise—and I’m very grateful for that opportunity. It’s helped remind me why Perl is my open source community of choice.

However, after only a few weeks I started to notice something odd: I had yet to speak with anyone who wasn’t Senior Developer. The overwhelming majority of persons with whom I spoke had well over ten years of experience with Perl. I believe the lowest number of years of Perl experience I saw was around eight. In my town of San Francisco it’s reasonable to see Senior Developers with five or fewer years of experience with a language. You can quibble with that definition, but there’s no denying that it’s the way we do things here. And since I was recruiting for a San Francisco office, all of these candidates qualified as Senior.

When I recognized that I was only speaking with (or even hearing of) senior developers some gears started turning in my mind. To verify my suspicion that Perl is a language of aging practitioners with few people available to replenish the ranks, I gathered some data…

Exhibits A and B. Since 2009, YAPC::NA and YAPC::EU have asked the following question on their respective post-conference surveys:

How do you rate your Perl knowledge?

  • Beginner
  • Intermediate
  • Advanced

All YAPC survey data is available online. I compiled the data from the past four years of responses to that question. The result was the following graphs. The Y-axis is the number of respondents in that year.

YAPC::EU Perl Experience by Year, 2009-2012
YAPC::NA Perl Experience by Year, 2009-2012

As the definitions of “Beginner,” “Intermediate,” and “Advanced” are left as exercises for the respondent, it’s impossible to make a direct correlation between these results and my soft definition of “senior developer” as one with five or more years of experience. Regardless, it’s very obvious from these graphs that there are remarkably few junior Perl programmers available and that issue is not being resolved as the years pass.

Because the best kind of data is MOAR DATA, I ran a very informal poll on the Linkedin Perl group. The question and results:

How many years have you been programming Perl?

70% of the respondents have more than five years of experience programming Perl. A mere 13% are new to the language. (If you tilt your head to the right you can see a graphic summary of what this might mean for the Perl community.)

Granted, there is no small amount of selection bias going on here. People who attend YAPC or participate in the Linkedin Perl group are more likely to be more experienced and comfortable in the community than more junior developers.

Regardless, after seeing these numbers I’m convinced that the practitioners of Perl are aging and not enough junior developers are being created to sustain the language as a going concern in the development world. What’s worse, Perl does not appear to have any sort of succession plan. It’s turning into the Shakers of the software development world: attempting to rely on conversion for proliferation rather than on reproduction.

In the next post, I’ll tell you why you should care about this. Read Part 2

Announcing the Perl Companies project

A month or so ago Jeff Thalhammer and I were chatting Perl over burritos. We got to discussing how many companies were currently using Perl actively and wondered whether there were a list anywhere on the web. We checked. There wasn’t (well, not any comprehensive or modern ones).

Well, now there is. Announcing the Perl_Companies project.

The list was built using postings from the entire history of jobs.perl.org and on that front owes its existence to a prior project by brian d. foy.

There are currently two versions of the list: a CSV file for downloading and manipulation and a Markdown file for human readability. The original data whence the list was drawn is also available in the repo.

I believe this list is going to be incredibly useful to the Perl community. It can be used as a source for job hunts, sponsorship requests, market research for new products, or put to any number of other purposes. If nothing else, it’s fun to browse.

Admittedly, this list still has some problems (*cough* deduping *cough*). Sure, there’s room for improvement, but it’s still a damn sight better than the diddly squat we had before. Plus, thanks to the wonders of open source and Github, we can all collaborate to build upon this good start. So bring on those pull requests. Open some issues. Let’s make it better together.

Rename Perl 5? Marketing: UR DOIN IT WRONG

Earlier this month Ovid once again raised the question: Should we rename Perl?”

As usual, the question sparked a flurry of opinions on the matter. Most of the discussion occurred in the comments of Ovid’s original post.

I’m not here to chime in on that question. Whether the name should change or should not, what it should change to, when it would happen, these questions are all closed. RJBS has said there will be no change right now and that’s that. He is driving the Perl 5 bus right now. If he says the name is not changing then that’s good enough for me. Discussion closed.

No, I’m not here to discuss that matter. I’m here to point something out:

Damn, team. That was some dismal marketing I just witnessed.

Just what exactly is the problem you’re looking to solve here? Where are the metrics to support that? Whom are you looking to convince? How will the solution be rolled out? Who’s going to do the work? What’s it going to cost? How will you know when the work is done? How will you know whether it’s working?

None of the people participating in the conversation would ever consider releasing a small patch to a CPAN module without first having a complete set of tests for it. Yet the same people seem to have no problem changing something as fundamental as the name of the language without performing some sort of market research and testing.

Despite the reputation its earned, marketing is not a crap shoot. A successful marketing or branding campaign requires just as much forethought and carefully considered execution as a good piece of software. You don’t just throw it together, put it out there and hope it does what the target audience needs. It could be impossible to recover from the damage caused by rash branding decisions.

I would welcome nothing more than more discussions about whether Perl 5 should be renamed. But I would like them to be as well researched and considered as any other change which would be made to the language itself.

Putting Away My Pitchfork: The Yahoo Remote Worker Announcement

On February 22nd, 2013, Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer announced that all remote employees will be required to work from their local Yahoo! office by June.

The internet grabbed its pitchforks and lit its torches then exploded with anger and derision.

Does this announcement place a hardship on remote Yahoo! employees? Probably.

Is this a draconian move by Mayer? It seems that way.

Would I have done the same in her place? I don’t know. And neither do you.

The fact of the matter is that none of us are in her place. As a company, Yahoo! has been foundering for years and Mayer is now at the wheel trying to right the ship. I’m not their CEO. Neither are you (unless you actually are Marissa, in which case, “Hi!”).

To be entirely clear and open: My initial reaction to the announcement was horror and anger. I am a supporter of remote working arrangements, and not only because I have one myself. I realize that there are good people everywhere and setting up an infrastructure to support remote workers allows companies to find the best people for the job, no matter where they’re located. However I also realize that without the appropriate infrastructure a remote working arrangement can be disastrous to a product and a company. It’s not for everyone. It’s not for every company.

Mayer is many things, but one thing she is not is a fool. Before this decision was announced she knew it wouldn’t play in Peoria. She knew there would be PR fallout. She knew the internet would cast her in the role of the wicked witch. She also knew a hell of a lot of other details to which none of us are privy.

This could not have been a swift decision, made in a moment of passion. Undoubtedly it was researched, calculated and discussed ad nauseam. Without access to that research and the discussions around it, none of us can know whether this is a good decision for Yahoo!.

I feel for the Yahooligans who now must uproot their working lives, I truly do. But I’m going to resist my impulse to pillory Marissa Mayer for her decision until I know more about what led to it.

Is it OK to apply at a company which doesn’t excite you?

A question which just arrived at my desk:

There’s a company that has some openings for what I do. I’ve met with a couple of employees from there and wasn’t wowed by what the place is doing. Is it OK for me to apply or would that be unethical?

To answer the question: Yes, it’s OK for him to apply and No it’s not unethical. There are two reasons for this.

First of all, this is only an application and—as we all know—submitting an application is no guarantee of getting an interview. Even with the contacts he’s already made at the company, it’s possible that his skill set won’t be what the hiring manager needs or that someone else better fits the bill. There is no risk to him in applying for the position.

Secondly, speaking with a couple of current employees of the company may not have given him the information he needs to judge whether he would enjoy working there. I applaud that he’s taken the time to sit down and chat with these people. Ideally this is a step everyone would be able to take in their job hunting process. It is, however, only half of a picture. The other half comes with the interview, when he’s able to speak with a broader range of people within the company, including managers who may be able to give him the lowdown on the exciting things planned for the team. It may be that once he’s spoken with more people he’ll decide that it’s a company and a project he really believes in, but he’s not going to know for sure until after that interview.

Applying for the position allows the company to decide whether he might be right for them. Interviewing allows both parties to decide whether they are right for each other. Both steps are purely fact-finding in nature. There’s no risk. There’s no commitment.

The question of ethics comes in when and/or if a job offer is made. If, after all of the steps in the interview process, this man is still not particularly interested in the company then it’s best for all involved that he not accept the offer. To commit to a job and a company which you don’t really want leads you to have a life of drudgery, which is bad enough, but it’s also disingenuous to your new coworkers. They assume you’re there because you want to be there and that you care as much as they do about the mission of the team. Accepting a job just so you can phone it in and collect a paycheck is a dishonorable way to make a living.

Of course there are always going to be exceptions to this rule. For instance, if you’ve been out of work for a long while and need any job to keep the children fed and the mortgage paid then, by all means, accept the job you are offered rather than await the one of your dreams. There will be time enough to trade up once you’ve provided some security for your family. Exceptions aside, it’s generally a bad idea to accept a job about which you feel, at best, ambivalent.

Many thanks go to this anonymous gentleman who sent this question my way. As a tech hiring manager it’s a relief to see people who really think and care about their careers.

On a related note: if any readers are looking for a skilled technical project manager who is as friendly as he is knowledgable, I may know someone in the market. Drop me a line and we’ll talk.

Four Questions To Answer For Every Project

Pause. Push away from your keyboard. Answer these questions:

  1. WHAT are you trying to accomplish?
  2. WHY are you trying to do it?
  3. HOW are you going to do it?
  4. WHEN will you know you’re done?

If you don’t have answers then you need to stop what you’re doing before you waste more time than you already have. You’re working from best guesses and assumptions and setting yourself and the project up for failure.

Managers, if you’re not prepared to tell your team the answers to each one of these questions then you’d better be prepared to miss deadlines, go over-budget and miss the target entirely on functionality.

The best way to improve the chances of success for any project—technical or not—is to do some sort of planning. It doesn’t need to take very long, but at the end of the process everyone involved with the project should know the answers to the What, Why, How, and When of the matter. Only then can you have some confidence that everyone is on the same page and only then say you have a project team.

Improving Perl’s New Programmer Outreach

I don’t think I’ve ever seen so much demand for programmers or programming training. In an economy that’s still recovering from the recession, the remarkably low unemployment rate among programmers plus the relatively high rate of pay is drawing ever more people to the industry.

You hear it over and over again: “I want to learn to program but need help to start.” If you search on the web you can find an abundance of “learn to program” opportunities. Most of the offline/meatspace ones use Java, Ruby or Python as the language of choice. I found none that use Perl, which I see as an opportunity the Perl community should pursue.

The availability of more beginning programming training provided in Perl would be beneficial both to the trainees and to the Perl language and community. As languages go, Perl quite easy to learn (or at least no harder than the popular alternatives). The basic programming concepts are fairly straightforward in syntax, sigils can help a neophyte to keep her data structures straight, and CPAN can enable a beginner to produce remarkably functional code in a limited amount of time. This leads to higher student confidence, since (as we’ve all experienced), creating something that works makes you feel good and want to keep learning more.

Perl, for its part, could benefit by using this training as positive propaganda to help dispel the negative brand image it’s developed and been unable to shake for all these years. Pundits and wags on Stack Overflow, reddit and elsewhere enjoy repeating the chestnuts that Perl is dead or is good only for scripting and parsing text, not for “web scale” projects. An influx of new programmers—trained on Perl and in the best practices recommended and used by modern Perl developers—would help to dispel these misconceptions, even if afterward they went on to use other languages.

As an example of an organization I think really does training right, I direct you to the San Francisco Ruby community. SF Ruby puts on a training session at least once a month. At least one of these, admirably, is focused on teaching women to program. In addition to training sessions, SF Ruby also organizes several hack nights each month, providing ample opportunities for newbies to mingle with more experienced programmers and get personalized assistance.

Now, in comparison, I’m going to pick on my local Perl Mongers group. SF.pm. Before I start, please be clear that I use SF.pm here only because it’s convenient and—as you’ll see in a moment—provides a dramatic comparison. The SF Perl Mongers are a great group of people. This is not intended as a slight against them or the organization. I simply wish to show that the Perl community could increase its outreach to new programmers.

I’ve compiled data on the number of training and hacking sessions organized by SF Ruby and SF.pm in 2012. All data is drawn from the Meetup calendars for each organization. A ‘training’ event is defined as anything focused on helping people learn the language and includes beginners’ hack nights, study groups, API office hours and more formal training sessions. A ‘hacking’ event, simply enough, is anything with the word ‘hack’ in the title.

Month SF Ruby SF Perl Mongers
  Training Hacking Training Hacking
January 1 5 0 0
February 3 9 0 0
March 1 6 0 0
April 3 7 0 1
May 2 6 0 0
June 4 5 0 0
July 8 4 0 0
August 7 6 0 0
September 4 5 0 0
October 2 5 0 0
November 2 5 0 0
December 3 3 0 0
TOTAL 40 66 0 1

The numbers, as you can see, are staggeringly different. That said, there is also a huge difference in the size of each of these communities on Meetup.com. SF Perl Mongers has a membership of 380 people. SF Ruby has 5588. This naturally affords SF Ruby more resources to provide these events but does not, I believe, excuse SF.pm for providing almost none.

SF Ruby deserves everyone’s attention and commendation for all of their work in training and outreach. It’s a model which Perl should look to emulate. While the resources of my local Perl community may not allow it to scale to the level of the 44 training and 66 hacking events put on by SF Ruby in the last year (nor do I think they should attempt to do so), I would hope those resources could allow for at least one training session every month or so and a newbie-friendly hack session every few weeks[*].

If Perl wants to show people that it’s alive and well it needs to be more active in public ways like this. Outreach to help introduce novices (especially minorities) to programming would go a long way toward dispelling the out-of-date image the tech community has of the Perl language.


[*]: Full disclosure: I am guilty of not offering to help SF.pm in this effort. This is an oversight I hope to correct. This post is the first step in that process. Back to reading.